Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ...
All right. I hereby propose Matthew Langham for commit access.
What he will commit is up to him, hopefully something :)
No, seriously, there has been a huge amount of discussions on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the role of committership compared to membership. Some projects have been accused to give away commit access as *free candy*. I disagree. Delegation is a strenght.
I'd rather have 20 idle committers than leaving a possible committer out there.
Committership is not about 'writing code', is about being 'a citizen of the cocoon community'. And citizens have a passport that lets them into the country easy. Our country is our CVS module.
Result, I don't see why Matthew, which has helped cocoon immensively and continously in the past 18 months, shouldn't deserve cocoon citizenship.
Place your vote.
+1 Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
