As soon as Cocoon becomes a top level Apache project, comparison discussions will appear much more often.
We need a strong PR person to work with Stefano. +1 for Matthew. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:47 PM Subject: Re: [vote] Cocoon citizenship for Matthew Langham > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > ... > > > > > All right. I hereby propose Matthew Langham for commit access. > > > > What he will commit is up to him, hopefully something :) > > > > No, seriously, there has been a huge amount of discussions on > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the role of committership compared to > > membership. Some projects have been accused to give away commit access > > as *free candy*. I disagree. Delegation is a strenght. > > > > I'd rather have 20 idle committers than leaving a possible committer > > out there. > > > > Committership is not about 'writing code', is about being 'a citizen > > of the cocoon community'. And citizens have a passport that lets them > > into the country easy. Our country is our CVS module. > > > > Result, I don't see why Matthew, which has helped cocoon immensively > > and continously in the past 18 months, shouldn't deserve cocoon > > citizenship. > > > > Place your vote. > > > +1 > > Vadim > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
