Steven Noels wrote:
David Crossley wrote:

Earlier in this thread i alerted the list to what i see
as a major flaw. I think that the answer is simple:
The initial PMC is formed from "all committers" - the
whole list at xml-cocoon2/who.xml no matter what their
status. They can take themselves off the PMC if they
wish. No distinction is the best way.

To be really correct, I assume we need use the avail list:

bash-2.04$ cat /home/cvs/CVSROOT/avail | grep xml-cocoon2
avail|

twl,stefano,balld,ricardo,rubys,ben,zvia,giacomo,gears,bmclaugh,
bloritsch,rossb,jeremy,greenrd,dims,ssahuc,prussell,cziegeler,donaldp,
mman,sylvain,vgritsenko,haul,morrijr,crossley,ovidiu,tcurdt,gianugo,
froehlich,huber,dirkx,butlermh,nicolaken,ivelin,kpiroumian,shannon,
proyal,stephan,coliver,crafterm,acoliver,stevenn,bdelacretaz

|xml-cocoon,xml-cocoon2,xml-cocoon2-apps,xml-site,xml-commons

... and invite all people explicitely. People who have lost interest in Cocoon won't answer the invitation then.
I like this.

I also agree with David that 'active committer' is not exactly easy to define (also, that's right, from that standard I'm not that 'active' code-wise)

So, what about doing this:

1) I write email to everyone listed there (and will copy this mail list)

2) they have 72 hours to reply to that email indicating their interest in partecipating (replying privately to me or publicly as they wish)

3) at the end, I'll post here the list of people that replied and we'll include them in the proposal.

[if they take longer to reply, we'll add them anyway, we don't need to be that strict]

NOTE: the message will contain a description of what does it mean to be part of a PMC.

What do you think?

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to