Marcus Crafter wrote:
Just some thoughts (sorry if this already has been discussed, I may have missed it) : why not keeping the "sendPageAndContinue" ?Hi Troops!Hope all is well. I've just checked in BZ#14903 which changes the names of the flow sendPage* functions as previously discussed in the 'flow wishlist' thread. Unfortunately the change is *not* backwards compatible so please be careful and update any flow code you might have locally after updating. The changes are: sendPage() becomes sendPageAndWait() sendPageAndContinue() becomes sendPage() The last one is the tricky one because the method names are essentially swapped.
This would remove any ambiguity that may be attached to the somewhat imprecise "sendPage".
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]