Michael Melhem wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:19:33PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:Ah, ok, I understand... but I'm still uncomfortable with having a precise "sendPageAndWait" and an imprecise "sendPage", as inconsistent naming always leads to confusion.
sendPageAndContinue is precisely the problem, many people were confusing "Continue" with continuations!Marcus Crafter wrote:Hi Troops!Just some thoughts (sorry if this already has been discussed, I may have missed it) : why not keeping the "sendPageAndContinue" ?
Hope all is well.
I've just checked in BZ#14903 which changes the names of the flow sendPage* functions as previously discussed in the 'flow wishlist' thread.
Unfortunately the change is *not* backwards compatible so please be careful and update any flow code you might have locally after updating.
The changes are:
sendPage() becomes sendPageAndWait()
sendPageAndContinue() becomes sendPage()
The last one is the tricky one because the method names are essentially swapped.
So, last try : what about "sendPageAndReturn" ?
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
