Re: [RT]: Names for pipeline components section

[Stefano Mazzocchi]

Giacomo Pati wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[...]

The pipelines are statically built and must remain so. Having a verb
describing the act of piping might not reflect the concept that
pipelines are static assemblations of operational constructs.

So, I like

<components>
 <pipes>
  <pipe>

and

<pipelines>
 <pipeline>
  <match>
   <generate>

Too bad this breaks our mapping between java names and sitemap names.

what do you mean?

map:generator    Generator.java    generate
map:transformer  Transformer.java  transform
...              ...               ...
map:pipe         Pipeline.java     pipeline

Is this a real problem? I've never thought about such relationship.
Anybody else?

Well, if somebody thinks it is a problem we can change the java classname with much less user pain.

Anyway, I personally don't care about those java mappings anyway since I don't picture people actually implementing those pipes themselves.

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]