On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:01:04AM +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > >>map:generator Generator.java generate > > >>map:transformer Transformer.java transform > > >>... ... ... > > >>map:pipe Pipeline.java pipeline > > > > > > > > > Is this a real problem? I've never thought about such relationship. > > > Anybody else? > > > > Well, if somebody thinks it is a problem we can change the java > > classname with much less user pain. > > > The classes and interfaces are new for 2.1, so changing them is absolutely > painless. > > Having a weekend for thinking about the naming problem, I think Stefano > is right, that map:pipe (= a verb) is not a good choice to use for the > pipelines section (= the section where pipelines are defined).
Actually, I too think Stefeno has a valid point here. So no objection from me. :) Michael > > So, I agree (now) that we should rename the components section from > map:pipeline to map:pipe. > > Anyone against this? If not I can rename them tomorrow. > > Carsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
