On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Luca Morandini wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: ChartTransformer 0.0.4 urge a commiter!
> >
>
> > I've looked at the source code, and it's one class, and it's heavily
> > tied to JFreeChart. Wings is much more abstract in this regard. I don't
> > think that it will be easy to make it renderer-agnostic.
> >
>
> Yep. We tried to make it as simple as possible, which has meant binding it to 
>JFreeChart.
>
>
> > Also, the fact that it's tied to a LGPL package is something I don't like.
>
> Yes, this opinion of yours is very clear.
>
>
> > The fact that you want to continue with adding many features to it makes
> > me think that you will need quite a lot of freedom too.
>
> No. It is just that we don't want to lose our momentum. Moreover, we'd like to add 
>XY graphs to make it truly a charting solution.
>
>
> > I think you should set it up on cocoondev and chenge the license to APL
> > compatible, for all the reasons I said in my email
>
> ChartTransformer is already APL, only JFreeChart is not. Moreover, as Steven 
>suggested, the codebase my be offically donated to
> Apache.
>
>
> > Fnally, if there is going to be *a* charting package, it should be
> > renderer agnostic. If not, they should have their own names (as FOP is
> > not FO, itext is not called PDF).
>
> I don't agree that it should neessarly be render-agnostic, since there is NO 
>open-standard for charting.
> Conversely I agree on changing its name: JFreeChartTransformer would give the people 
>developing JFreeChart their due :)

That reminds me with my discussion with Stefano etc. for year ago.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-apache-general&m=101130268126515&w=2

Luca, your ChartTransformer very intersting, and it will not be more
interesting, if it's part of the cocoon codebase.

I have also written a DiagramSerializer(yes ;-) I'm not joking).
In the past I adding the Slide support and the chaperon parser components
to the Cocoon codebase. But time went by, and I think more and more
that blowing up the codebase wasn't a good way :-/
If I set up a new webapp, I must always remove parts, which I don't
need.

We respect your good will! Try first cocoondev or sourceforge, believe me.

Stephan Michels.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to