On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:42, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Generally speaking, I agree. Especially if they could not be reproduced > > from CVS. Moreover, all releases should be available and not only the > > set we have now (see <dream/> in this thread). But given limited > > hardware, I think it's ok to archive it on another machine. > > > > What do you think? > > I say we do this incrementally: > > 1) first we remove all the betas, alphas, release candidates from xml > and jakarta > > 2) if the problem persists, we iterate again. > > for the future, we'll think about ways to decentralize the distribution > system even from the source.
How could this possibly be a problem??? We talk about 60MB download, a release every week would be ~3GB per year, let's say 10GB to accommodate for larger distros, and other stuff (3x). Where do I send the 30GB worth of RAID hard drives? Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
