Niclas Hedhman wrote:
hardware is only 0.01% of the problem, Niclas. Politics and human dynamics account for the remaining 99.99% and you can't fix that sending us something (unfortunately)On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:42, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:Generally speaking, I agree. Especially if they could not be reproduced from CVS. Moreover, all releases should be available and not only the set we have now (see <dream/> in this thread). But given limited hardware, I think it's ok to archive it on another machine. What do you think?I say we do this incrementally: 1) first we remove all the betas, alphas, release candidates from xml and jakarta 2) if the problem persists, we iterate again. for the future, we'll think about ways to decentralize the distribution system even from the source.
How could this possibly be a problem???
We talk about 60MB download, a release every week would be ~3GB per year, let's say 10GB to accommodate for larger distros, and other stuff (3x).
Where do I send the 30GB worth of RAID hard drives?
anyway, it seems that jakarta uses *alone* several gigs of disk space for nightly builds.
So, for now, we don't have to do anything.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
