Bill Barnhill wrote, On 12/02/2003 13.57:
...
If you don't like the idea, fine. There's probably a
reason I don't know about, as just about everyone on
this project has more experience with Open Source than
I do. But if you don't like what I'm saying, at least
tell me why.
It happens that nobody replies. It usually means that there is no big interest. So if you feel you have enough compelling reasons, you can continue on the proposed path, or else just wait.

I'm eager to contribute and while it's
too early to say I'm getting ignored (or kill file'd),
I am starting to wonder.
It's too early to say you're getting ignored.
And most of all, being ignored is not necessarily a bad thing. It's a neural stance, not positive, but not negative either.

Anyway, to get to the point, Maven-built projects do not work natively in Gump, and this is an important point. They do generate a gump descriptor with a simple ant buildfile, but it's not the real thing.

Krysalis Centipede www.krysalis.org/centiepde/ is a project that does what Maven does in a slightly different manner, and is compatible OOTB with Gump and Forrest.

I am the initial Centipede developer so I am certainly baised, but IMHO for Cocoon it's better ATM, because it's based on Ant and fully compatible and integrated with Gump and Forrest.

--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to