David Crossley wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:So what about closing cocoon-docs ? This would avoid believing some mysterious entities are writing the docs for us...
<snip/>
We are also planning to start using Forrest to build our own documentation, even if this will make it a circular dependency (cocoon depends on forrest and forrest depends on cocoon). But this is something the cocoon documentation team will decide with the forrest developers (most of which are also cocoon developers).<snip/>
As a special note, I would like to mention how the introduction of the Cocoon wiki (hosted personally by Steven Noels' web site www.cocoondev.org) has been seen by the user community as a great tool and has generated very high-quality and useful documentation. The cocoon wiki was also patched to sends diffs to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list (the documentation team), providing ownership and oversight. This is seen as a very useful tool by the documentation team.
Would people please stop referring to a "documentation team".There is no such separate thing. All that has happened is that there is a new mailing list where people should be able to discuss issues that are directly related to core documentation. Actually, the cocoon-docs list has had pathetic uptake. Is that because people are leaving documentation to be done by the mysterious "other people"?
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]