This is great!
We've been talking about doing this for a while now, so your patch is more than welcome!
I haven't had a chance to test it yet (and most likely I won't have one this week), but it's looking great. It would be great if you could add a small Anteater test to test the functionality.
One small observation (even though I hate naming discussions ;) I'd rename 'subrequest' to 'process' since is actually a verb and conveys the meaning of the method. You may also want to add it to the Interpreter interface, in case other flow interpreters come up (Scheme etc.)
What about 'callPipeline'?
-- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham] --------------------------------------------------------------------
