> From: Martin Holz > "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Now that Cocoon is a top most project with it's own domain and > > the ability to setup it's own (not in the Apache group of) cvs > > repositories, which the Cocoon PMC is free to administer, what > > improvement is there from a Sourceforge approach? > > Sourceforge is specialized in providing infrastructure for > lots of small projects. Should ASF duplicate this? > There is already a playground.
I know what Sourceforge is. But (and this is the *major* point) it's not Apache. The "Apache" brand shouldn't, IMHO, _require_ projects to use Sourceforge. I don't know much about the infrastructure behind Sourceforge (I only know a little about what's behind Apache), but I don't know what would happen to all source thats there if the money went away. I don't believe Apache would. Please don't get me wrong, I like the thought of Sourceforge and it has lots of uses. But this is Apache. I hope my point of view is clear without being forceful. J.
