(changing the topic so people notice its a vote) If I understand correctly, the proposed URL structure is:
http://cocoon.apache.org/v1.x/ http://cocoon.apache.org/v2.0/ http://cocoon.apache.org/v2.1/ http://cocoon.apache.org/ -> http://cocoon.apache.org/v2.0 (whatever's the current version) +1, looks nice. (mild preference for leaving out the '.x' in '1.x') --Jeff [leaving original email in for context] On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:01:16PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >"Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Things to do will be: > >> > >>1) move the existing docs to the cocoon.apache.org virtualhost (please > >>note that the copyright year on the web site is old!) > >> > >>2) create permanent redirects from the old location to the new one (so > >>that no links are broken) > >> > >>anything else? > > > > > >I would move it in a slightly different way, that will help us to be more > >flexible wih the new/updated documentation for v2.1 comes out: > > > >1) move /www/xml.apache.org/cocoon1/ to /www/cocoon.apache.org/v1.x/ > > > >2) setup permanent redirect from http://xml.apache.org/cocoon1/** to > > http://cocoon.apache.org/v1.x/{1} > > > >3) move /www/xml.apache.org/cocoon/ to /www/cocoon.apache.org/v2.0/ > > > >4) setup permanent redirect from http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/** to > > http://cocoon.apache.org/v2.0/{1} > > > >5) setup temporary redirect from http://cocoon.apache.org/ to > > http://cocoon.apache.org/v2.0/ (this will be changed to redirect to > > http://cocoon.apache.org/v2.1/ when we want to put live a new 2.1 based > > website) > > note that this redirect doesn't "redirect" the entire subtree (no ** and > > no {1} in this one). > > > >6) move the mirror.cgi and mirror.html fies to /www/cocoon.apache.org/ and > > keep them as generic as possible for all our downloads (1.x, 2.x, ...) > > > >This should not break any link right now, and at the same time, it will > >allow us to grow beyond 2.0 (whilst keeping the old doccos on line and > >without having to move them as we did with 1.x)... > > > >And it will only take a few minutes to set up... Let me know if I should > >shoot for it... > > I like it. But since URL space planning is a *very* serious issue, we > should do a real vote around this. > > so, please, guys, place your vote. > > NOTE: the vote reflects the URL space only, not how the documentation is > created/generate/updated, that will be discussed in a separate email > coming up next. > > Stefano. >
