"Andrew Savory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
>> 1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with
>> their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
>> branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch,
>> which is what is used to generate the web site.
>
> Hrm. Did we ever reach a consensus on splitting docs out into a separate
> CVS module? I still think it would be a _really_ good idea, as it makes no
> sense as far as I can tell to maintain two sets of documentation (it's
> hard enough getting people to contribute to it as it is, let's not place
> more barriers in the way!).
It sounds allright for me...
> One more question: is there not a machine where we could run the site
> "live" with Cocoon?
Nagoya... But I want to upgrade it to Solaris 9 and VXFS first... And I'm
waiting for Sun's licenses to come in...
Pier
