On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Diana Shannon wrote: > > > 1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with > > their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the > > branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch, > > which is what is used to generate the web site. > > Agreed this is a problem. > > Hopefully, now that we have two clearly separated repositories, people > will document only in the appropriate one.
Woah! I really don't think we want two sets of documentation, do we? It leads to unnecessary discrepancies, continuity issues and duplication of effort. There is no reason that I am aware of that we couldn't have one single set of documentation, and mark content where appropriate as "2.0 only" or "2.1 only". I'm sure that a cocoon-doc cvs module is the right way to go. Other than that, the rest of the idea for the publishing system sounds pretty good. Andrew. -- Andrew Savory Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managing Director Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658 Luminas Internet Applications Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135 This is not an official statement or order. Web: www.luminas.co.uk
