On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 03:22 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
I agree 100% with Andrew that two "clearly" separated repositories won't
really improve on what we had. But it's all we have at the moment.
Sure. I'm happy to help try and refactor it down to one archive. Or
perhaps we could set up cocoon-docs with the content from 2.1 and then go
through and import any 2.0 content that is missing? I'm assuming 2.1 is a
superset of 2.0 content.
You could say that. A majority of the core docs are the same. Only a handful of docs are different at the present time. Clearly this will start to change is we get more docs for various blocks/samples and if we start importing wiki content.
Do you have a particular approach in mind? If so, then this discussion should probably continue on cocoon-docs.
Really glad to know you are interested in helping.
Diana
