Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The discussion is about making the flow a technology that cocoon can depend on for years.

And this passes thru stabilizing the contracts between the flow scripters and the cocoon internals.

And I want this to be done by a community, not by only the few developers that cared and knew the code.

but I maybe entirely wrong.

if so, please let me know.

Ciao


I think from a technical point of view you're entirely right ;) Everyone wants more community involvement in the flow development. At the same time I think you must realize that when you throw out terms like "one-man-show" and "unclean" design, the person it's directed at will feel like its a personal attack. And that's not fun.





Reply via email to