Christopher Oliver wrote:OK... I spent some more time with the code and did some steps forward. Now, unfortunately, I'm stuck due to my ignorance: any further step would be just a wild bet from my part, and it would take me a lot of time to get acquainted with all the technologies involved (core javascript and hard-core continuation inners).
Let's see if we can strike a deal, while we try to find a better solution with the Rhino guys (something that ATM seems unlikely to me, given also that they are in RC phase):
If we integrate the continuations code with the current rhino cvs, I'm pretty sure Norris will commit it for us. But AFAIK that's not going to be easy.
This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help you in that. Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some interest, I'm starting to think that I'm just being paranoid...
You are not being paranoid. I have been uneasy about the forked rhino code but have kept quiet because I'm such a junior member of this community, because I personally did not feel able (time or knowledge wise) to help fix the situation, and because I am so behind on really understanding flow and continuations. But I think the longer we go on building on this sand the more trouble we will be in when the inevitable happens. I for one am reading every word you two write.
Geoff Howard
