On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:49 AM, Jeff Turner wrote:
- Switch on Forrestbot's commit facility, so any committer can regenerate and commit the updated HTML/PDF from the web interface.
+100 -- but we have a bit to do (jars pages, faqs, and redirects) before
it becomes the web site.
Whereabouts does Cocoon need redirects? Should redirects be done with .htaccess
files or <meta> refreshes? If .htaccess, they could exist in xml-site
without Forrest interfering.
I think most, though not all, redirects should be committer-
configurable/accessible. That is, when doc URI space changes, the person introducing the change needs the ability to indicate a redirect is required. This has happened a lot over the past year.
Isn't a single redirect config xml file (with old URI and new URI) that is parsed to create a single .htaccess file more efficient/maintainable than individual pages with <meta> refreshes?
Diana
