On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 09:54:53AM -0500, Diana Shannon wrote: > > On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:49 AM, Jeff Turner wrote: > > >> > >>>- Switch on Forrestbot's commit facility, so any committer can > >>> regenerate and commit the updated HTML/PDF from the web interface. > >> > >>+100 -- but we have a bit to do (jars pages, faqs, and redirects) > >>before > >>it becomes the web site. > > > >Whereabouts does Cocoon need redirects? Should redirects be done with > >.htaccess files or <meta> refreshes? If .htaccess, they could exist > >in xml-site without Forrest interfering. > > I think most, though not all, redirects should be committer- > configurable/accessible. That is, when doc URI space changes, the person > introducing the change needs the ability to indicate a redirect is > required. This has happened a lot over the past year. > > Isn't a single redirect config xml file (with old URI and new URI) that > is parsed to create a single .htaccess file more efficient/maintainable > than individual pages with <meta> refreshes?
Yes, this is certainly something Forrest should tackle. I have a half-written RT on an implementation somewhere.. Right now though, I just want to establish what functionality the old doc system provides that Forrest doesn't. Sounds like FAQs and jars.html is all? --Jeff > > Diana > >
