begin "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> "Lionix" == Lionix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't see why. Maybe multiple servers, multiple VSGs for > performance or organizational reasons, but Coda scales well in that > direction.
Nice to hear. > RVM (where the directory structure is kept) can be disabled when > initializing the client, but this means you need to keep all > information in memory, and of course it's not persistent. Increases Is a memory cache possible? Today one GB RAM is almost normal and there 300MB for a cache are possible. > startup costs and risk of mutation loss if there's a crash before > saving. Persistence doesn't matter. The machines running in 24/7 mode. > >> Does coda need a process in userspace to access the coda fs? > > Lionix> If you mean a process started by the user the reponse is > Lionix> no. Coda must be started by the root, init script stuff. > > Ie, "yes". The coda client is quite complex; the kernel provides only > enough services to implement to VFS interface, so that ordinary > programs can use usual file APIs. All real work is done by upcalls Why? Is there a reason, why the venus daemon can't be in the kernel? i.e, NFS or SMB doesn't needs a userspace daemon. > [Graph] Very good explanation. Joerg. end. -- Alle reden von sexueller Bel�stigung am Arbeitsplatz.. Wenn das nicht bald losgeht, k�ndige ICH!
