hahahha you are on the root-replicated volume.... What are you doing here .????? :o):(
This file is here to remember be if I wrongly chroot.
That's not a good argument i've used it for a test..ok, ok...
No matter it's my test machine !
Concerning acl behaviour have a look at :
http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/doc/html/kernel-venus-protocol-4.html
Shame to me ! Really time to read docs...
All fs-primitives have been rewrite in coda. How could it be different ?
Yes, this is like in AFS. But what is with the token? Must I type in my password two times, one for kerberos and one for coda?
Again I've never used kerberos....
Correct me if wrong but it's just an auth server used at identification time ( ftp, local login...etc)..
Thinking on this I don't see any reason to such a behaviour !
It would not be so technicaly impossible to use the STDIN password and send it to clog, if auth-call vs kerberos return is something like " auth granted"... After all isn't that the purpose of the pam_kerberos ?
Mmmmm..... but where is the STDIN ?
Or perhaps the behave is something like :
login & pass ---------> kerberos
||
PAM kerberos <--------- chekvalidity
if (return == "ok"){
system (clog [EMAIL PROTECTED]);
}
I don't know how Mr Popov implemented it, and I don't know kerberos mecanism.
I should stop speaking of things I don't know....
Think you'd better see the code, try, or ask him.
And I should stop thinking, exciting,writing stupid things....
and start working...
Endly I don't see any reasons uid to be the same... kerberos required ?
The only one i see would be for simplification reasons...
-- Lionix FS-Realm (newbee?) Administrator Hundreds hours of work but so powerful ! And still have to work
