On 12 septembre 08:18, Carl Crowder wrote: > I think it's a good idea. I personally dislike contributing to > hg-based projects because it's such a faff for me compared to using > git, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are put off contributing > for a similar reason (not that I'm saying the reason is good, I'm just > lazy!)
Isn't this rather a question of platform - github vs bitbucket ? On the command line tool side, I personnaly feel like mercurial is easier for newcomers. On the other hand, for power user, the hg+evolve workflow is very powerful. Ok, I'm biased since I know more about hg than git ;) -- Sylvain Thénault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42) Formations Python, Debian, Méth. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services CubicWeb, the semantic web framework: http://www.cubicweb.org _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
