On 9/12/14, Skip Montanaro <s...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Ian Cordasco > <graffatcolmin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was actually wondering if we should just keep it on BitBucket but >> convert >> it to git. This would allow the URL to remain the same so people will not >> be >> misled to the old repository. > > I had exactly this problem with pylockfile. Both for finding the repo, > and the distributions. If you're happy enough with BitBucket and it > supports git, that is the path I would choose. > > Skip >
Yeah, BitBucket does support it. While I'm not exactly a fan of BitBucket, it might be best to just continue hosting the repository for this reason. flake8 has been there for 3 (or more) years now and that's where people likely expect it to be. I consider this more-so to be Tarek's decision though and in light of his latest email I created the PyCQA org on GitHub to have something to host it under. It's in the tradition of PyCA and PyPA (Python Cryptographic and Packaging Authorities), but it can be renamed before we add any repos to it since it can sound rather presumptuous to some (even though it's mostly in jest). _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
