On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Juan BC <jbc.deve...@gmail.com> wrote: > as i say before, i am no interested in how is a quality of a project based > on the tolerance of their own community.
You didn't say that actually. > Mi interest is the quality based on a random sample of code from a random > sample of programmers. I use flake because my index of quality is based also > on flake8. I think you need to watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf-BqAjZb8M Following the letter of the document isn't following the spirit and the quality of a code base can be measured on far more than one axis. Quality of a code base should also be determined by whether it uses obvious security problems (as can be caught via bandit) and other logical errors (as can be caught by pylint). Quality can be further measured by the tests a project has. I urge you to reconsider how you're measuring "quality". Instead of calling it quality, please consider calling it "style conformance". They are very different things. _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
