sorry i think this is an steryl discussion. 1. I see this video before and i never say that my quality index is ONLY style. (and also all your recomendation are already inside the another parts of the equation)
I am not offended or angry, but because how the (F%$$#%) scientific publication works i can't tell you everything about the research before the journal make their decision about it. tanks for the comments. PS: i gonna free the dataset in the near future. On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 at 17:18 Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Juan BC <jbc.deve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > as i say before, i am no interested in how is a quality of a project > based > > on the tolerance of their own community. > > You didn't say that actually. > > > Mi interest is the quality based on a random sample of code from a random > > sample of programmers. I use flake because my index of quality is based > also > > on flake8. > > I think you need to watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf-BqAjZb8M > > Following the letter of the document isn't following the spirit and > the quality of a code base can be measured on far more than one axis. > Quality of a code base should also be determined by whether it uses > obvious security problems (as can be caught via bandit) and other > logical errors (as can be caught by pylint). Quality can be further > measured by the tests a project has. > > I urge you to reconsider how you're measuring "quality". Instead of > calling it quality, please consider calling it "style conformance". > They are very different things. > -- Juan BC (from phone)
_______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
