Hi Carl, From my point of view, they could all live in the organisation, at least pylint-plugin-utils and prospector still seem useful to folks.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Carl Crowder <carl.crow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > There are a few other things that came out of the ashes of Landscape.io that > may or may not make sense to move into PyCQA too: > > 1) pylint-celery - this one I don’t think anyone uses and it isn’t very > useful anyway > 2) pylint-plugin-utils - this is used by pylint-django and pylint-celery as > far as I know, I’m not sure how useful it is outside of that > 3) prospector - this is the bigger one, lots of people use this, but I can > understand that it might not be in the same state of mind as the rest of the > PyCQA code :-) > > Let me know what you think either way! > > Carl > > _______________________________________________ > code-quality mailing list > code-quality@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality > _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
