Planet code4lib is a planet planet, right? Is there a way to have
certain feeds accumulate into digests?
Simon
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2010, at 12:55 PM, "Edward M. Corrado"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Jay Luker wrote:
-1 on removing delicious
--jay
If anyone is counting:
removing_delicious--
Edward
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jodi Schneider
<[email protected]> wrote:
I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of
this is one
of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for
me to
pinboard.in).
I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody
wants to
take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have...
-Jodi
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael J. Giarlo <
[email protected]> wrote:
Reasonable arguments. The nice thing is that if delicious is
removed,
you can just subscribe to:
http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib
Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's
stewardship.
:) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a
distraction; I
can already track that elsewhere.)
-Mike
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:35, Rosalyn Metz
<[email protected]> wrote:
I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share
articles
we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I
would hate
for that medium to disappear.
Rosalyn
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
-----Original Message-----
From: Ranti Junus <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:25:07
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR
I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed
because I
think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that
anything
code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have
to go
and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If
the
majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me.
ranti.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[email protected]
>
wrote:
+1 to all that as well
Kevin
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo
<[email protected]> wrote:
+1 to removing flickr
+1 to removing delicious as well
+1 to jrochkind using his discretion
-Mike
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[email protected]
>
wrote:
Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet.
CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make
your case
(on
list or in private email to me), but at the moment as
'editor' of the
planet
I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with
Bernadette (I had
the
same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for
it
before
doing it. :) ).
[Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1) Someone
could add
a
link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home
page,
perhaps
under 'photos'. 2) If you happen to know that there are a
bunch of
photos
at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the
_search
results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr. Delicious tag
code4lib is
still on
the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo,
or we'll
be
back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought
of. ]
Jonathan
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote:
Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on
flickr
are
playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the
bend.
Would it
be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at
least,
if photos
must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so
that feed
readers
don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have
been at
least
that many in these past few days.
I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe
Jonathan
Rochkind <[email protected]> will be able to help...
--
Bulk mail. Postage paid.
