On Dec 6, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Montoya, Gabriela wrote: > ... > I'd much rather see resources invested in data synching than spending it in > saving text dumps that will most likely not be referred to again. > ...
In a MARC-as-the-record-of-record scenario; storing the original raw MARC might be helpful for the syncing -- when a "sync" was happing, the new MARC of record could maybe be compared against the old MARC of record to know that RDF triples needed to be updated?
