Thanks, Roy (and others!)
It looks like the 245 is including the $c - dang! I should have been
more specific. I'm mainly interested in the title, which is $a $b -- I'm
looking at the gains and losses of bytes should one implement FRBR. As a
hedge, could I ask what've you got for the 240? that may be closer to
reality.
kc
On 10/16/13 10:57 AM, Roy Tennant wrote:
I don't even have to fire it up. That's a statistic that we generate
quarterly (albeit via Hadoop). Here you go:
100 - 30.3
245 - 103.1
600 - 41
610 - 48.8
611 - 61.4
630 - 40.8
648 - 23.8
650 - 35.1
651 - 39.6
653 - 33.3
654 - 38.1
655 - 22.5
656 - 30.6
657 - 27.4
658 - 30.7
662 - 41.7
Roy
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Sean Hannan <[email protected]> wrote:
That sounds like a request for Roy to fire up the ole OCLC Hadoop.
-Sean
On 10/16/13 1:06 PM, "Karen Coyle" <[email protected]> wrote:
Anybody have data for the average length of specific MARC fields in some
reasonably representative database? I mainly need 100, 245, 6xx.
Thanks,
kc
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
