On 10/16/13 12:33 PM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
BTW, I don't think 240 is a good substitute as the content is very
different than in the regular title. That's where you'll find music, laws,
selections, translations and it's totally littered with subfields. The 70.1
figure from the stripped 245 is probably closer to the mark
Yes, you are right, especially for the particular purpose I am looking
at. Thanks.
IMO, what you stand to gain in functionality, maintenance, and analysis is
much more interesting than potential space gains/losses.
Yes, obviously. But there exists an apology for FRBR that says that it
will save cataloger time and will be more efficient in a database. I
think it's worth taking a look at those assumptions. If there is a way
to measure functionality, maintenance, etc. then we should measure it,
for sure.
kc
kyle
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Karen Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks, Roy (and others!)
It looks like the 245 is including the $c - dang! I should have been more
specific. I'm mainly interested in the title, which is $a $b -- I'm looking
at the gains and losses of bytes should one implement FRBR. As a hedge,
could I ask what've you got for the 240? that may be closer to reality.
kc
On 10/16/13 10:57 AM, Roy Tennant wrote:
I don't even have to fire it up. That's a statistic that we generate
quarterly (albeit via Hadoop). Here you go:
100 - 30.3
245 - 103.1
600 - 41
610 - 48.8
611 - 61.4
630 - 40.8
648 - 23.8
650 - 35.1
651 - 39.6
653 - 33.3
654 - 38.1
655 - 22.5
656 - 30.6
657 - 27.4
658 - 30.7
662 - 41.7
Roy
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Sean Hannan <[email protected]> wrote:
That sounds like a request for Roy to fire up the ole OCLC Hadoop.
-Sean
On 10/16/13 1:06 PM, "Karen Coyle" <[email protected]> wrote:
Anybody have data for the average length of specific MARC fields in some
reasonably representative database? I mainly need 100, 245, 6xx.
Thanks,
kc
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
--
Karen Coyle
[email protected] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
