/me wonders if this particular branch of the conversation would benefit from reading the other branch where there is a action plan starting to formulate to create better documentation + doc/comm practices; however, she does not want to deny anyone the chance to continue this branch of the conversation.
... /me grabs popcorn as is customary in reading these type of branched conversations, while starting to plot out areas/categories for this weekend's doc dive. Thanks, Becky Sent from the ball and chain > On Feb 17, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Cary Gordon <listu...@chillco.com> wrote: > > Sure. Until I can turn my Raspberry Pi into a Robo-brarian 5000, technology > alone is not going to be the answer. Choosing right tool for the job, > however, can provide some relief to the day-job-holding masses. > > Does/should becoming involved in Code4LibCon be the modern equivalent of Myst? > > Cary > >>> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: >>> >>> The conference organizers have control, in theory, but I think that they >>> are understandably loath to mess with the traditional mix. There is no >>> place for them to ask a question and get a single, cogent, authoritative >>> answer. >> >> Who is better to _provide_ a single authoritative answer about a conference >> then the conference organizers? Why would they be looking to get a single >> authoritative answer from someone else -- I'd assume everyone else would be >> looking to them! >> >> I do see how the decentralized nobody-in-charge but >> everybody-willing-to-complain nature of Code4Lib as a community (rather than >> an organization) poses some challenges. (It also provides some advantages, >> everything is a trade-off, although not all trade-offs are equal, and the >> best trade-off may change when the context changes). >> >> But, I'm not sure this is a technology/tooling problem. As we all have to >> remember at our day jobs too, don't look for technological product solutions >> to social/organizational problems. They aren't going to be successful, but >> you can spend a lot of resources learning that. >> >> Jonathan
