Please release me, let me go For I can’t benefit from this anymore To waste our lifes would be a sin Release me and let me get to work again
With apologies to Jim Reeves > On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:55 PM, [Becky Yoose] <b.yo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > /me wonders if this particular branch of the conversation would benefit from > reading the other branch where there is a action plan starting to formulate > to create better documentation + doc/comm practices; however, she does not > want to deny anyone the chance to continue this branch of the conversation. > > ... > > /me grabs popcorn as is customary in reading these type of branched > conversations, while starting to plot out areas/categories for this weekend's > doc dive. > > Thanks, > Becky > > Sent from the ball and chain > >> On Feb 17, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Cary Gordon <listu...@chillco.com> wrote: >> >> Sure. Until I can turn my Raspberry Pi into a Robo-brarian 5000, technology >> alone is not going to be the answer. Choosing right tool for the job, >> however, can provide some relief to the day-job-holding masses. >> >> Does/should becoming involved in Code4LibCon be the modern equivalent of >> Myst? >> >> Cary >> >>>> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>> The conference organizers have control, in theory, but I think that they >>>> are understandably loath to mess with the traditional mix. There is no >>>> place for them to ask a question and get a single, cogent, authoritative >>>> answer. >>> >>> Who is better to _provide_ a single authoritative answer about a conference >>> then the conference organizers? Why would they be looking to get a single >>> authoritative answer from someone else -- I'd assume everyone else would be >>> looking to them! >>> >>> I do see how the decentralized nobody-in-charge but >>> everybody-willing-to-complain nature of Code4Lib as a community (rather >>> than an organization) poses some challenges. (It also provides some >>> advantages, everything is a trade-off, although not all trade-offs are >>> equal, and the best trade-off may change when the context changes). >>> >>> But, I'm not sure this is a technology/tooling problem. As we all have to >>> remember at our day jobs too, don't look for technological product >>> solutions to social/organizational problems. They aren't going to be >>> successful, but you can spend a lot of resources learning that. >>> >>> Jonathan
