So the issue being discussed on AUTOCAT was the availability/fault tolerance of 
the database, given that it's spread over numerous remote systems, and I 
suppose local caching and mirroring are the answers there.  

The other issue was skepticism about the feasibility of indexing all these 
remote sources, which led me to thinking about remote indexes, but I see the 
answer is that that's why we won't be using single-site local systems so much, 
but instead using Google-like web-scale indexes.  That's putting pressure on 
the old vision of "the library catalog" as "our database".

Is that a fair understanding?

Cindy Harper
char...@vts.edu 

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Eric 
Lease Morgan
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:44 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] linked data question

On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Sarah Weissman <seweiss...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am kind of new to this linked data thing, but it seems like the real 
> power of it is not full-text search, but linking through the use of 
> shared vocabularies. So if you have data about Jane Austen in your 
> database and you are using the same URI as other databases to 
> represent Jane Austen in your data (say 
> http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jane_Austen), then you (or rather, your 
> software) can do an exact search on that URI in remote resources vs. a 
> fuzzy text search. In other words, linked data is really
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> supposed to be linked by machines and discoverable through URIs. If 
> you
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> visit the URL: http://dbpedia.org/page/Jane_Austen you can see a 
> human-interpretable representation of the data a SPARQL endpoint would 
> return for a query for triples {http://dbpedia.org/page/Jane_Austen ?p ?o}.
> This is essentially asking the database for all 
> subject-predicate-object facts it contains where Jane Austen is the subject.


Again, seweissman++  The implementation of linked data is VERY much like the 
implementation of a relational database over HTTP, and in such a scenario, the 
URIs are the database keys. —ELM

Reply via email to