On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Keith Winstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Did you compare with fq_codel? None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel >> by itself. >> > > Hi Jim, > > In our evaluation there's only one flow over the queue (in each direction) > -- the videoconference. So, yes. > > In the upcoming paper where we try and come up with the best end-to-end > schemes for multiuser traffic, we compare against Cubic-over-sfqCoDel ( > http://www.pollere.net/Txtdocs/sfqcodel.cc). > Great. I sure wish we could get together on *fq_codel variants. Kathy thinks that there is no difference between sfq_codel and fq_codel, and Dave thinks there is a difference. Sigh.... - Jim > > Cheers, > Keith >
_______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
