Is that indeed what I think? On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Keith Winstein <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Did you compare with fq_codel? None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel by >>> itself. >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> In our evaluation there's only one flow over the queue (in each direction) >> -- the videoconference. So, yes. >> >> In the upcoming paper where we try and come up with the best end-to-end >> schemes for multiuser traffic, we compare against Cubic-over-sfqCoDel >> (http://www.pollere.net/Txtdocs/sfqcodel.cc). > > Great. > > I sure wish we could get together on *fq_codel variants. Kathy thinks that > there is no difference between sfq_codel and fq_codel, and Dave thinks there > is a difference. > > Sigh.... > - Jim > >> >> Cheers, >> Keith > > _______________________________________________ > Codel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
_______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
