One other difference between the two builds looks strange, but I can't say
it's a problem. In the "check" case, the locals
generated for a method are all in order.
JAVA_INT
> online_tantrix_common_GameBoard_formForcedList___R_int(CODENAME_ONE_THREAD_STATE,
>
> JAVA_OBJECT __cn1ThisObject) {
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_1_ = 0; /* v1 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_2_ = 0; /* v2 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_3_ = 0; /* v3 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_4_ = 0; /* v4 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_5_ = 0; /* v5 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_6_ = 0; /* v6 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_7_ = 0; /* v7 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_8_ = 0; /* v8 */
> DEFINE_INSTANCE_METHOD_STACK(6, 9, 0, 9832, 9896);
>
whereas in the "nocheck" sources, the locals are perturbed into some other
order
JAVA_INT
> online_tantrix_common_GameBoard_formForcedList___R_int(CODENAME_ONE_THREAD_STATE,
>
> JAVA_OBJECT __cn1ThisObject) {
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_3_ = 0; /* v3 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_2_ = 0; /* v2 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_5_ = 0; /* v5 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_4_ = 0; /* v4 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_7_ = 0; /* v7 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_6_ = 0; /* v6 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_8_ = 0; /* v8 */
> volatile JAVA_INT ilocals_1_ = 0; /* v1 */
> DEFINE_INSTANCE_METHOD_STACK(6, 9, 0, 9832, 9896);
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CodenameOne Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/codenameone-discussions.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/4dea178c-6581-49ba-9a5c-4928334f6911%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
