I know you are very busy. :) I still suspect Shai,Shanna, and Lianna are the same person.
I couldn't check on StackOverflow for other questions other that mine but I think you provide the assistance with the same one-answer/comment-a-day. If it is so I think you missed the opportunity to create hype and traffic about CN on StackOverflow. You should be happy if someone creates questions and questions, especially programming ones. (I avoid using SO not to expose the many problems CN has) As I said, in my case, you also go off track here. About what you said about me not testing on physical devices, you are wrong. You slowed down my development to 10 months instead of 1 (the Android version took me 2 months, the Swift version about 1). But I appreciate any kind of help you could give. I also created things that you said it were impossible to achieve. When my development has finished I started to test on Android devices and it was me that discovered the nasty issue about the BrowserComponent, because you did not perform the test on the hardware devices. Regards Il giorno giovedì 11 marzo 2021 alle 04:37:11 UTC+1 Shai Almog ha scritto: > You only see a small portion of the support I do daily. > I read your answers fast because you specifically have an issue with > getting to the point. > > You're complaining about my reading of your questions when clearly you > still think CEF is on Android (it isn't) CEF only impacts the simulator and > nothing else! > I wrote that before. I also warned you about some choices and about your > approach of ignoring device testing which is crucial and I very > specifically warned you about that when you started. So don't put this on > me. > > I'm still trying to help but there are limits to what we can do. > > On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 9:33:30 AM UTC+2 P5music wrote: > >> Thank you for answering. >> I have to say that nothing is personal here but I think it is good for >> you and CN that I say something more. >> >> As you can see in the most recent comments here >> https://groups.google.com/g/codenameone-discussions/c/gOK2zf9x5Lc >> and >> https://groups.google.com/g/codenameone-discussions/c/121OlNeKXh0 >> >> you are not paying attention to what it is written in the requests, >> especially when they are subtle, you forget also what you said before. >> Maybe you literally address the requests at the end of the day when you >> are tired. >> >> As you know not many questions here or on StackOverflow are issued every >> day (very few) so >> nobody is harassing you with continuous questions, and nobody is >> overwhelming you with questions. >> >> It is unconceivable that even comments on SO are addressed at the end of >> the day, for the next day. >> >> It's you who are multiplying the questions here: >> It takes an average three-days of exchanges to get a focused answer about >> the real thread subject, followed by denials, negations, looping and so on. >> Sometimes just non-sense is issued to postpone to tomorrow. I am not so >> naive not to realize that. >> >> A reasonable kind of assistance would encompass supporting a thread until >> conclusion, >> not this way (also, very often you forget what has been said in the >> thread the previous days). >> If a developer is harassing you with many new threads in a day, you can >> simply ignore him/her until the next day. >> >> [My issue about CEF is very important, if you consider that your CEF on >> Android is not able to handle long-press events, >> but it's not all about mouse events, it does not handle text selection >> correctly too as I said in the same issue: >> think about a new enterprise customer that does not want that the user >> can select text in the BrowserComponent, >> if they create a prototype they see that CEF is not able to do so and the >> text is selectable, such a simple basic issue, >> they check if there is an issue on github and they see that it has been >> opened for months, >> well, they go away immediately. >> Yes, maybe it is important only for them now but you are aware that it is >> technically important nonetheless, >> and fix it, feeling lucky to have the possibility to prevent other >> customers from stumbling into it.] >> >> I have a free account but after 10 months I cannot be dismissed at the >> final stage of publishing the app. >> This is just common sense. >> >> I hope this does not upset you tonight, but it is important because you >> can improve. >> Regards >> >> >> Il giorno mercoledì 10 marzo 2021 alle 04:35:14 UTC+1 Shai Almog ha >> scritto: >> >>> I think you have unreasonable expectations. I spend a lot of time >>> supporting and trying to help regardless of your subscription status. >>> We do resolve a lot of issues for all subscription levels but our >>> general rule of thumb is about blockers and big issues. This is a big issue >>> for you but it isn't for anyone else. Most people don't mix HTML and Java >>> code too much. These have always been the difficult edge cases in every >>> platform that mixes those. >>> Yes CEF does have issues but those issues are limited to the simulator >>> for the most part. On the device the implementation has been the same for >>> years and literally no one complained about the problem you ran into. >>> Since it happens on Android you can debug this using Android Studio. I >>> don;t know if it happens on iOS but I repeatedly made it clear that you >>> need an iOS device and need to test iteratively. There's a limit to working >>> with the simulator and when you work heavily on native peers (and HTML is a >>> native peer) you need a device. >>> >>> On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 9:48:34 AM UTC+2 P5music wrote: >>> >>>> Already done debugging on Android in regard to this: >>>> BrowserComponent: mouse events handled differently in Android device >>>> than simulator (google.com) >>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/codenameone-discussions/c/121OlNeKXh0> >>>> >>>> Mouse events for long press are not working. I filed an issue. >>>> It seems that you released the CEF without even bothering to check some >>>> HTML-Javascript content inside. >>>> >>>> Now I cannot publish my app because the very first functioning of a >>>> BrowserComponent is not available. And I already wasted a month of Apple >>>> developer program, not mentioning being on this project from June 2020. >>>> >>>> I have a free account but one could look at it from a different >>>> perspective: you released a new feature without any testing and luckily >>>> you >>>> have an early tester for free. >>>> But you are not listening to it. >>>> >>>> When I subscribed as CN developer I received an e-mail saying like >>>> "please help us to spread the use of the CodenameOne" or something similar. >>>> But how are we supposed to help if you do not fix issues of such >>>> importance, that are already deployed in fact. >>>> >>>> Believe me, many times I returned to my Swift project, not difficult to >>>> update it because a few lines of development were possible for me to do in >>>> months with this very painful day-to-day before-going-bed "free" >>>> assistance >>>> you think is doing good for CN here and on StackOverflow, >>>> >>>> but Swift/SwiftUI is so awful that I had to continue with the CN >>>> project, >>>> >>>> that I like, do not misunderstand me, it has many avantages I want in a >>>> project, >>>> >>>> and I believe in having an easy way to develop for iOS without >>>> surrendering to Apple. >>>> This it the "plus" of CodenameOne, not the cross-platform stuff for >>>> Android or Blackberry or desktop. >>>> >>>> How do you see it? >>>> Regards >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodenameOne Discussions" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codenameone-discussions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/fa8ca097-ab2d-4db7-b8d4-6e89d112bf85n%40googlegroups.com.
