On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Darren Smith wrote:
> Hi > > I've been testing the modified Undernet (2.10.10) code with Vincent > Sweeney based on the simple usleep(100000) addition to s_bsd.c > > PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU | # USERS > 2 0 96348K 96144K poll 0 29.0H 39.01% 39.01% | 1700 <- Without > Patch > 10 0 77584K 77336K nanslp 0 7:08 5.71% 5.71% | 1500 <- With > Patch Were you not putting a delay argument into poll(), or perhaps not letting it delay long enough? If you just do poll with a timeout of 0, its going to suck lots of cpu. Regards, Aaron
