Aaron Sethman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Darren Smith wrote: > > > I mean I added a usleep() before the poll in s_bsd.c for the undernet > > 2.10.10 code.
> Why not just add the additional delay into the poll() timeout? It just > seems like you were not doing enough of a delay in poll(). No, because the poll() delay only has an effect if there are no readable fd's. What the usleep() does is allow time for more fd's to become readable/writeable before poll() is called, spreading the poll() overhead over more actual work. -Doug -- Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees. --T. J. Jackson, 1863
