>Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:27:19 +0100
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: nighty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] banlist
>
>At 10:35 21/02/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > the two most recent bans (e.g. number 30 and 31) are at the end of
>> > your list, you can notice they were not set by a user, but by the
>> > server ...
>>
>>This isn't correct:
>>1. new list items are always put at the begin of the list.
>>
>>2. see the timestamps of the bans, which show that the bans at the end
>>are the oldest
>
>i guess that those bans were actually *originally* set prior to any other
>BUT ... when you *see* a server SET bans .. it doesn really set them
>at the present moment like if a user did, it is just resynchronizing with the
>list that server has on its side .. I guess it just pass around the ORIGINAL
>Timestamp it has.
>
>regards,
>
>
>
>>:Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 367 KeK|PoSlA #charlesbourg
>>*!*@modemcable196.223-130-66.que.mc.videotron.ca
>>|KeKuN| 1013556673
>>
>>:Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 367 KeK|PoSlA #charlesbourg
>>*!*martien@*.sprint.ca
>>Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 1013397004
>>
>>:Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 367 KeK|PoSlA #charlesbourg
>>*!cristal582@HSE-Quebec-City-ppp*.qc.sympatico.ca
>>Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 1013397004
>>
>>:Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 368 KeK|PoSlA #charlesbourg
>>:End of Channel Ban List

Reply via email to