daaave wrote: > OK, I'm about to show the extent of my (lack of) knowledge of X, > but...I assume the issue that you're talking about is that if you issue > "/msg x unban *!*@*", then it will not only remove that ban, but also > any ban that's a subset of it (which in this case is _all_ of them). If > that's the issue, then the correct solution, as far as I can see, is to > make the unban command more robust, with a flag that tells X only to > remove the ban specifically given, and not any sub-bans.
Or alternatively, provide this as an option in X for channel owners to set at their discretion.
