Hello Cosmin, Friday, May 17, 2002, 2:50:20 PM, you wrote:
CM> Hello. CM> Almost everybody knows that if you have sufficient CM> access in a channel to set a ban through X and you set CM> that ban on *!*@*.* X will kick all users from that CM> channel. You need access level >= ban level to remove CM> it. The problem is that the username's password can be CM> stolen. So, with a stolen password and sufficient CM> access you can kick out an entire channel. This CM> sucks... CM> My proposal is to add a new channel setting (level CM> 500). For example FULLBAN (OFF or ON) which allow (or CM> not) users to set bans on *.* . I guess is a good CM> ideea... 10x & please excuse my english. CM> Best regards, CM> JL` CM> __________________________________________________ CM> Do You Yahoo!? CM> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience CM> http://launch.yahoo.com Nice idea, but there is one problem. If you have looked at the mailingarchive you would see this problem has been discussed before and noone seems to care about it. Sounds harsch and is a personal opinion. But likely to be a fact. Stolen usernames are considered a lack of security on the clients side where the user has not put enough efforts into securing his data. Thus in case of a compromised client the client is on his own and needs to act damn quickly in immediately mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] . The problem that accompanies it that this mailbox receives massive amounts of mail, so before they read it could take a couple of days. My opinion is to completly remove the option to be able to use *!*@* as kick/ban mask. (Run: you stated you would use it to clean up your banlist, so it would only be needed to UNBAN, no need to use it for BAN/KICK in this matter) -- Best regards, Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]