Hello Cosmin,

Friday, May 17, 2002, 2:50:20 PM, you wrote:

CM> Hello.

CM> Almost everybody knows that if you have sufficient
CM> access in a channel to set a ban through X and you set
CM> that ban on *!*@*.* X will kick all users from that
CM> channel. You need access level >= ban level to remove
CM> it. The problem is that the username's password can be
CM> stolen. So, with a stolen password and sufficient
CM> access you can kick out an entire channel. This
CM> sucks...
CM> My proposal is to add a new channel setting (level
CM> 500). For example FULLBAN (OFF or ON) which allow (or
CM> not) users to set bans on *.* . I guess is a good
CM> ideea... 10x & please excuse my english.

CM> Best regards,
CM> JL`


CM> __________________________________________________
CM> Do You Yahoo!?
CM> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
CM> http://launch.yahoo.com

Nice idea, but there is one problem. If you have looked at the
mailingarchive you would see this problem has been discussed before
and noone seems to care about it. Sounds harsch and is a personal
opinion. But likely to be a fact.
Stolen usernames are considered a lack of security on the clients side
where the user has not put enough efforts into securing his data. Thus
in case of a compromised client the client is on his own and needs to
act damn quickly in immediately mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
The problem that accompanies it that this mailbox receives massive
amounts of mail, so before they read it could take a couple of days.

My opinion is to completly remove the option to be able to use *!*@*
as kick/ban mask. (Run: you stated you would use it to clean up your banlist, so it
would only be needed to UNBAN, no need to use it for BAN/KICK in this
matter)


-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to