Hello. Alexander wrote:
>Nice idea, but there is one problem. If you have looked at the >mailingarchive you would see this problem has been discussed before >and noone seems to care about it. Sounds harsch and is a personal >opinion. But likely to be a fact. Sorry... I'm new in the mailing list (1 week). I didn't knew you already discussed this problem. Snatcher wrote: >As you login you will, as you already know, be notified on NEVER to >give out your password. >Those who does it, doesn't really pay attention to what the undernet cs >has to say about username/channel security. I agree with you but the passwords still can be stolen. Mine was stolen with the help of Sub7 virus... The result was a ban on *!*@*.* on all the channels I had access. And now I'm a bad guy in those channels... Course is my mistake... Don't login if you don't know that the computer is clean... But how many users know if the computer is clean? Isomer wrote: >How does the IRC daemon know if a ban is a full ban? > > *!*@* > *!*@*.* > *!*@*.??? > *!~*@* > *!*@?*.???* > >Then of course you can do: > *!*@*.?? > *!*@*.com > *!*@*.net > *!*@*.org > *!*@*.info I think is enough to add something only for host/IP. If the banned host/IP doesn't contain a character a-z, A-Z or a digit 0-9 then the banmask to be a wrong one. A ban on *!*@*.c* won't make X to kick all users in that channel (only if all of them have a "c" in their hostname). I think is a good ideea UNBAN to remain the same (to remove *!*@*) 10x. Best regards, JL` __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com
