Okay, just tried it! 8) Bug submitted on the site for 2.10.11 Note that I'll be forced to revert to the old version if we can't find why the server isn't able to deal with netburst anymore in this version. 8(
regards, radium On the 6 Octobre 2002 22:45, you wrote : > Greetings. As some of you have no doubt figured out by now, our CVS > repository is now hosted by SourceForge. This isn't the only resource > SourceForge provides us with--we also have access to their "artifact" > tracking system. Currently, the undernet-ircu project on SourceForge > has three trackers configured--one for bugs, one for feature requests, > and one for patches. Here's what we're going to do with them: > > Bugs: > > All bugs are to be posted to the bug tracking system on SourceForge. > We will try to take any that are reported via [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > get them up there as well. Any patches for bugs should be attached > to a bug report and *not* submitted via the patch tracker. > > Feature requests: > > All feature requests are to be posted to the feature request tracking > system on SourceForge. We probably will not post any that come across > the list there, though we will still try to comment on them and > implement ones that make sense. Patches to implement features should > be attached to a feature tracker report. > > Patches: > > Believe it or not, there are patches that don't fall into the above > two categories, such as documentation patches. These patches should be > submitted via the patch tracker. All other patches should be attached > to particular bug or feature request reports, and will then be moved to > the patch tracker. > > Hopefully this will help keep us from losing track of patches or bugs that > people submit. The trackers are available via the undernet-ircu project > page on SourceForge: http://sf.net/projects/undernet-ircu/ > > Thanks!
