Hehehe - but ofcourse! Silly me.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Ross Sent: December 21, 2005 6:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [coldspring-dev] replacing getBean You definitely don't want to modify the core framework... but it would be trivial to write your own wrapper around the BeanFactory that has a load() method (which delegates to getBean()). Let us know if you need help writing such a thing. -Dave On 12/21/05, Baz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Maybe 1000 was a bit of an exaggeration - but definitely in the > mid-hundreds. I don't use a public framework - I've been working with my own > for several years now. > > > > Baz > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Peter J. Farrell > Sent: December 21, 2005 5:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [coldspring-dev] replacing getBean > > > > Baz wrote: > > > > Damn, I thought someone might say that. So basically it comes down to > whether I should change 1000+ instances of the "load" command - or just get > stuck with having to modify coldspring slightly with every new release. I > may actually change the 1000+ instances - since it seems to be an easy > find/replace. > > > > Cheers, > > Baz > > From what I understand, ColdSpring model Java's Spring pretty much - > including terminology and the DTD (that's why there isn't a CS DTD yet). > I'd do a search and replace my friend! However, a 1000+ seems a bit much -- > are you using a framework like Mach-II or Model-Glue? Or just ad hoc? > > .Peter > > -- > Peter J. Farrell :: Maestro Publishing > http://blog.maestropublishing.com > > Rooibos Generator - Version 2.1 > Create boilerplate beans and transfer objects for ColdFusion! > http://rooibos.maestropublishing.com/ > > - Member Team Mach-II > - Member Team Fusion >
