Now I heard you were hard at work with cfHibernate :) It's the 1.0 declaration. No pressure really, just last I checked Chris and Dave were expecting an end-of-January release. So I thought I would ask.
-Adam On 2/6/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know that Chris Scott just added some new remoting features. I have been > hard at work getting the factory-bean/factory-method attributes supported. I > talked to Chris and we were shooting for a release soon but I think we are > all pretty busy right now so we might need to wait a few weeks to wrap > everything up. > > Sorry for not responding earlier. I know that Dave and Chris are super busy > so I thought I would throw an update about what I was working on. Is there > are particular feature you guys are looking for in the next release, or is > it the 1.0 declaration you seek? :) > > --Kurt > > On 2/6/06, Callum McGillivray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello ! > > > > > > Adrocknaphobia wrote: > > Anyone out there? It's Feb 6 and I haven't seen a post to list since Jan > 25. > > > > -Adam > > > > On 2/2/06, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > **bump** > > > > On 1/12/06, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey Adam, > > > > We're looking good I think. Remoting is very very close, and I think > > we just need to tackle FactoryBeans. Off the top of my head I don't > > know what else... Maybe I should check the issue tracker! But > > seriously, Dave says end of January, sounds good to me! > > > > -Chris > > > > On Jan 12, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Adrocknaphobia wrote: > > > > > > > > *bump* > > > > I figure I'll ask at least once a month until we have a timeframe. > > > > When can we expect a 1.0 release? > > > > -Adam > > > > On 11/2/05, Dave Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 11/2/05, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > That's exactly why I'm asking. I was just curious if there is like a > > feature cut-off. > > > > Not at all... what 1.0 means to me is that any existing APIs have > > been > > hardened to the point where they will only change with restrictions > > ( http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html). For the core > BeanFactory, > > the > > API is already what I consider "solid", AOP is getting there, so > > really we aren't that far from 1.0. There's nothing that say features > > can't be added post-1.0, either. > > > > One of the things I stress about ColdSpring (and this carries over > > from Spring's mentality) is that whenever possible, new packages are > > implemented such that they don't depend on the core framework, and > > the > > core framework doesn't depend on them. Spring is distributed as > > several jars, and while I won't do that with ColdSpring, the same > > idea > > applies. > > > > -Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
