--Kurt
On 2/7/06, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I heard you were hard at work with cfHibernate :)
It's the 1.0 declaration. No pressure really, just last I checked
Chris and Dave were expecting an end-of-January release. So I thought
I would ask.
-Adam
On 2/6/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that Chris Scott just added some new remoting features. I have been
> hard at work getting the factory-bean/factory-method attributes supported. I
> talked to Chris and we were shooting for a release soon but I think we are
> all pretty busy right now so we might need to wait a few weeks to wrap
> everything up.
>
> Sorry for not responding earlier. I know that Dave and Chris are super busy
> so I thought I would throw an update about what I was working on. Is there
> are particular feature you guys are looking for in the next release, or is
> it the 1.0 declaration you seek? :)
>
> --Kurt
>
> On 2/6/06, Callum McGillivray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> >
> > Adrocknaphobia wrote:
> > Anyone out there? It's Feb 6 and I haven't seen a post to list since Jan
> 25.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> > On 2/2/06, Adrocknaphobia
< [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > **bump**
> >
> > On 1/12/06, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hey Adam,
> >
> > We're looking good I think. Remoting is very very close, and I think
> > we just need to tackle FactoryBeans. Off the top of my head I don't
> > know what else... Maybe I should check the issue tracker! But
> > seriously, Dave says end of January, sounds good to me!
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> > On Jan 12, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Adrocknaphobia wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > *bump*
> >
> > I figure I'll ask at least once a month until we have a timeframe.
> >
> > When can we expect a 1.0 release?
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> > On 11/2/05, Dave Ross
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/2/05, Adrocknaphobia < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > That's exactly why I'm asking. I was just curious if there is like a
> > feature cut-off.
> >
> > Not at all... what 1.0 means to me is that any existing APIs have
> > been
> > hardened to the point where they will only change with restrictions
> > (
http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html ). For the core
> BeanFactory,
> > the
> > API is already what I consider "solid", AOP is getting there, so
> > really we aren't that far from 1.0. There's nothing that say features
> > can't be added post-1.0, either.
> >
> > One of the things I stress about ColdSpring (and this carries over
> > from Spring's mentality) is that whenever possible, new packages are
> > implemented such that they don't depend on the core framework, and
> > the
> > core framework doesn't depend on them. Spring is distributed as
> > several jars, and while I won't do that with ColdSpring, the same
> > idea
> > applies.
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
